High-risk mental states. Genetic vulnerability and childhood trauma. A case report

Published

2012-12-01

How to Cite

Freund Llovera, N., García Ramos, P. R., Harkous Peña, C. A., Brañas González, A., & Pelaz Antolín, A. (2012). High-risk mental states. Genetic vulnerability and childhood trauma. A case report. Revista De Psiquiatría Infanto-Juvenil, 29(4), 47–51. Retrieved from https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/view/233

Issue

Section

Case reports

Authors

  • N Freund Llovera Área de Gestión Clínica de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
  • P R García Ramos Área de Gestión Clínica de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
  • C A Harkous Peña Área de Gestión Clínica de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
  • A Brañas González Área de Gestión Clínica de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias. Centro de especialidades Francisco Díaz.
  • A Pelaz Antolín Servicio de Psiquiatría Infanto Juvenil. Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Keywords:

Psychosis, children, adolescents, prodromes, trauma

Abstract

Traumatic events in childhood have been associated with an increased risk of psychiatric disorders and given its high prevalence, it is likely to be a determinant of mental illness. Psychosis is an experience that reflects a dimensional psychopathological syndromic nature of affective components, cognitive style of thinking, loss of ego boundaries or a serious deterioration in the assessment of reality. We present the case of a teenager with a family genetic charge of severe mental disorder, who contacted the mental health service after attenuated psychotic symptoms and Brief and Limited Intermitent Psychosis, in the context of traumatic life events. A recent meta-analysis discusses the relationship between the risk of psychosis and early psychological trauma. It is suggested that psychological trauma may promote neurochemical changes and psychopathological of a vulnerable individual. It remains to study the role of psychotherapeutic interventions in the course of highrisk mental states and their possible evolution to a psychotic disorder.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isometsa E, Pirkola S, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 19-28.

2. Birchwood M, Todd P, Jackson C. Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 1998; 172: 53-9.

3. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, Francey S, Cosgrave EM, et al. Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59: 921-8.

4. Yung AR, McGorry PD. The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22: 353-70.

5. McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC. Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication II: associations with persistence of DSM-IV disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67: 124-32.

6. Bendall S, Jackson HJ, Hulbert CA, McGorry PD. Childhood trauma and psychotic disorders: a systematic, critical review of the evidence. Schizophr Bull 2008; 34: 568-79.

7. Heins M, Simons C, Lataster T, Pfeifer S, Versmissen D, Lardinois M, et al. Childhood trauma and psychosis: a case-control and case-sibling comparison across different levels of genetic liability, psychopathology, and type of trauma. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168: 1286-94.

8. Read J, Bentall RP, Fosse R. Time to abandon the bio-bio-bio model of psychosis: Exploring the epigenetic and psychological mechanisms by which adverse life events lead to psychotic symptoms. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2009; 18: 299-310.

9. Varese F, Smeets F, Drukker M, Lieverse R, Lataster T, Viechtbauer W, et al. Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis: A Meta- analysis of Patient-Control, Prospective- and Cross-sectional Cohort Studies. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38: 661-671.

10. Kandel ER. Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 505-24.

Most read articles by the same author(s)